The anti-industrial-technological revolution shall not be one of a political nature; it will not seek to overthrow governments but rather the technological and economic basis of the current civilisation.
The current techno-industrial system is destructive to all beings and environmental elements; it is not, nor should any of it be salvageable, for its nature is inherently harmful. The system is built so that it knows what it can afford to lose at any given time and what must be kept intact for its immaculate function. It knows that to maintain itself, it must wait for the exact moment to encourage reform in a manner that will appear as if it is beneficial, ethical, open to changes that at the time appear to be great, whilst practicing wickedness in the dark since the spotlight is right where it wishes it to be.
Seemingly small or huge so-called victories in reform are enormous failures to the natural order of the planet and its beings. Reforms work by momentarily blinding the public so as not to allow revolution to become an option in the mind of either the masses or the few.
Legislation and regulation are among the system’s safeguards designed to prevent the formation of revolutionary organisations and movements, whether underground or aboveground.
Protests and riots are most often ways for the public to release anger and frustration, to regain autonomy and control over its society, and to satisfy a human need to form a community of sorts. Rebellions may happen from time to time, but they, too, as chaotic and as easily suppressible, do not achieve success, much less a purposeful and significant change; in fact, more often than not, a rebellion backfires as the system introduces stricter and stronger reactions towards rebels and aspirant rebels.
Policing the rebel and revolutionary-minded becomes significantly more prevalent, attempts to find and infiltrate underground revolutionary groups suddenly become more pervasive, and the methods more sophisticated. The presence of authorities surrounding aboveground groups becomes the norm.
The policing of aboveground and underground organisations differs in intent and level of wit, planning, and mechanisms of action.
Aboveground movements are, by default, under surveillance:
The identities of those aligned with them are known. The creators, members, and sympathisers are not only on a list, but also are targets of heavy monitoring. The actions of aboveground movements are known to the public as well as their ideology and trajectory. The public and private conversations of the creators and members are closely monitored to establish any direct connection, indirect association, or link between them and any potential underground organisation, or any person suspected of being part of such a movement.
Underground organisations are meant to stay that way, however, there are some things one should consider:
The activities carried out by a particular underground organisation might lead the public to pay attention depending on the gravity of those actions; it might also be known by authorities without becoming known to the public. The danger lies in being found out and being oblivious to it. Authorities will either try to disintegrate the group before it acts, arrest members as they are properly identified, or infiltrate the group, acting on information gathered by remote spies.
A successful underground operation remains in the shadows.
Black Deer Project 